COMMANDMENTS

^{KING JAMES VERSION, MATTHEW CHAPTER 5 VERSES 17-20:}
Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.


 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
 
Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
 
For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven.


CHRISTIANS SAY, "WE'RE NOT UNDER THE LAW.  WE'RE UNDER GRACE." 

SO, HOW IS IT THEN, THAT CHRISTIANS ARE NOT "UNDER THE LAW",  WHEN VERSE 17 CLEARLY SHOWS THAT JESUS SAID HE DIDN'T COME TO DESTROY THE LAW? 

JESUS SAID THAT HE COME TO FULFIL.  FULFIL WHAT?  THE LAW OF COURSE!  THE LAW  INCLUDES THE TEN COMMANDMENTS AND OTHER LAWS  THAT GOD COMMANDED.  JESUS FULFILLED THE LAW  BY OBEYING THE LAW!  EASY UNDERSTANDING!  JESUS EVEN KEPT GOD'S SABBATH DAYS! 

BELOW IS THE AMERICAN 2011 CALENDAR WITH ALL THE WEEKLY SABBATH DAYS OF REST (SATURDAYS), IN CASE CHRISTIANS MISSED OUT HONORING THOSE DAYS.     

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BEGINS ITS WEEKDAYS WITH SUNDAY AND ENDS THE WEEK WITH SATURDAY.  GOD SAID THE 7TH DAY OF THE WEEK IS A HOLY DAY, A DAY OF REST FOR MANKIND, IT IS HIS DAY, IT IS HIS SABBATH, TO HONOR HIS CREATION.  THEREFORE SATURDAY, BEING THE 7TH DAY OF THE WEEK CALENDAR  OF AMERICA, IS GOD'S SABBATH.  THEREFORE, ALL CHRISTIANS WHO DON'T OBSERVE, HONOR, KEEP THE SABBATH, THOSE CHRISTIANS DON'T FULFIL  THE LAW, THEY DON'T CARRY OUT THE LAW, THEY DON'T EXECUTE THE LAW, AS COMMANDED SO BY GOD. 

BUT CHURCH LEADERS AND OTHERS INTERPRET "FULFIL" TO MEAN THE PREDICTION OF THE COMING OF CHRIST AND DESTRUCTION OF GOD'S LAWS.  READ VERSE 17 AGAIN.  JESUS SAID HE'S NOT GOING TO DESTROY THE LAW, BUT FULFIL THE LAW.


ALL THAT "WE'RE UNDER GRACE" TALK, IS BULL CRAP!  THOSE CHRISTIANS NEED TO PUT THEIR FACES CLOSE TO A COW'S ASS AND WATCH THE CRAP DROP FOR A DOSE OF REALITY.

"WE'RE UNDER GRACE NOW".  LOL.  IN THE OLD TESTAMENT, THERE'S EVENTS OF PEOPLE BEING UNDER GOD'S GRACE, FOR EXAMPLE, MOSES AND KING DAVID.  GOD EVEN SPREAD HIS GRACE ON ISRAEL ENEMIES, LIKE NEBUCHADNEZZAR II:

KING JAMES VERSION, JEREMIAH CHAPTER 27 VERSES 6-8: 
 
And now have I given all these lands into the hand of Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon, my servant; and the beasts of the field have I given him also to serve him.
 
And all nations shall serve him, and his son, and his son's son, until the very time of his land come: and then many nations and great kings shall serve themselves of him.
 
And it shall come to pass, that the nation and kingdom which will not serve the same Nebuchadnezzar the king of Babylon, and that will not put their neck under the yoke of the king of Babylon, that nation will I punish, saith the LORD, with the sword, and with the famine, and with the pestilence, until I have consumed them by his hand.

PHOTO OF NEBUCHADNEZZAR

JUST BECAUSE GOD HAS GRACE ON PEOPLE, IT DOESN'T MEAN HIS LAWS ARE DONE AWAY WITH.  GRACE DOESN'T MEAN NO MORE GOD'S LAWS. 

BUT CHURCH LEADERS AND OTHERS INTERPRET "FULFIL" TO MEAN THE PREDICTION OF THE COMING OF CHRIST AND THE DESTRUCTION OF GOD'S LAWS.  READ VERSE 17 AGAIN.  JESUS SAID HE'S NOT GOING TO DESTROY THE LAW, BUT RATHER FULFIL THE LAW, CARRY OUT GOD'S LAW, COMPLETELY BE OBEDIENT TO GOD'S LAW!

JUST MAKING A POINT ABOUT PEOPLE CALLING THEMSELVES CHRISTIANS OR WHATEVER, BUT THEY DON'T KEEP GOD'S LAW LIKE JESUS!

LIKE FATHER, LIKE SON.  PEOPLE WANT TO BE LIKE THE JESUS, BUT NOT LIKE HIS FATHER, EVEN THOUGH JESUS SAID, "I AND MY FATHER ARE ONE", MEANING THAT, AS THE FATHER, SO THE SON!

HEAL

KING JAMES VERSION, MATTHEW CHAPTER 4 VERSES 23-24:

And Jesus went about all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the kingdom, and healing all manner of sickness and all manner of disease among the people.
 
And his fame went throughout all Syria: and they brought unto him all sick people that were taken with divers diseases and torments, and those which were possessed with devils, and those which were lunatick, and those that had the palsy; and he healed them.

IF YOU WANNA KNOW WHY CHRISTIAN LEADERS AREN'T HEALING ALL MANNER OF SICKNESS AND DISEASE, INCLUDING MENTAL DISEASES, IT'S BECAUSE THEY KNOW JESUS REALLY DIDN'T DO THOSE HEALINGS THAT MATTHEW CLAIMS.

THE BOOK OF JOHN SAY "TRY THE SPIRIT".  SO I CHALLEGE ANY AND ALL CHRISTIAN LEADERS TO PROVE THAT THEY THEMSELVES HAVE FAITH IN CHRIST, BY GOING  TO CHILDREN'S HOSPITALS AND HEAL ALL MANNER OF SICK AND DISEASES CHILDREN BROUGHT TO THEM IN THE HOSPITALS.  I KNOW THAT THEY'LL FIND A WAY TO WEASEL OUT THIS TEST, AS ALWAYS!  THEY'RE WORSE THAN THE LAYMEMBERS!

BAPTISM

^{KING JAMES VERSION, MATTHEW CHAPTER 3 VERSES 16-17:}
And Jesus, when he was baptized, went up straightway out of the water: and, lo, the heavens were opened unto him, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove, and lighting upon him:


And lo a voice from heaven, saying, This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.

IF YOU WERE BAPTIZED, DID THE HEAVENS OPEN TO YOU?  THEY DID TO JESUS.

DID YOU SEE THE SPIRIT OF GOD DESCENDING LIKE A DOVE?  JESUS DID.

AND IF YOU DID SEE THE DOVE, DID IT LIGHT UPON YOU?  IT DID JESUS THAT WAY.


AND DID YOU HEAR GOD'S VOICE FROM HEAVEN SAYING THAT YOU WERE HIS BELOVED CHILD IN WHOM HE WAS WELL PLEASED?  JOHN AND JESUS DID.

SO, WHEN YOU WERE BAPTIZED, AND THE HEAVENS DIDN'T OPEN UNTO YOU, AND YOU DIDN'T SEE THE SPIRIT OF GOD DESCENDING LIKE A DOVE AND LIGHTING UPON YOU, AND YOU DIDN'T HEAR GOD'S VOICE SAYING THAT YOU WERE HIS CHILD IN WHOM HE WAS WELL PLEASED, THEN YOU NEED TO RETHINK THINGS OVER CONCERNING THE BIBLE. 

PERHAPS YOU WEREN'T BAPTIZED CORRECTLY,  AND GOD WAS WAITING ON THE FINAL QUE TO OPEN HEAVEN AND RELEASE THE DOVE (LOL).   

YES, SPIRITUAL LEADERS GOT A WAY AROUND YOUR QUESTIONS.  THEY'LL SAY HEAVEN DID OPEN UNTO YOU, BUT IN A SPIRITUAL WAY (LOL), AND THEY SAW THE DOVE DESCENDING AND IT DID LIGHT UPON YOU AFTER YOU RECIEVED JESUS INTO YOUR LIFE (FOR YOU HOLY ROLLERS, THE LEADER WILL SAY THAT WHEN YOU GOT THE HOLY GHOST, THAT WAS THE PRESENCE OF THE DOVE LIGHTING UPON YOU).

THE BAPTISM THING IS TRULY ONE BIG JOKE.  ALL THAT "OLD THINGS BECOME NEW" IS CRAP!  MANY CHRISTIANS HAVE WOKE UP TO THAT.

SON

^{KING JAMES VERSION, MATTHEW CHAPTER 4, VERSES 5-7:}
Then the devil taketh him up into the holy city, and setteth him on a pinnacle of the temple,


And saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone.


Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God.


THE THING ABOUT THIS STORY IS THAT THE DEVIL KNEW THAT JESUS WAS THE SON OF GOD.  AND THE DEVIL KNEW MORE ABOUT JESUS, THEN JESUS KNEW ABOUT HIMSELF.  THE DEVIL KNEW FROM JUMPSTREET, THAT JESUS WASN'T GOING TO FAIL THOSE TEMPTATIONS.  SO WHY BOTHER TO TEST JESUS IN THE FIRST PLACE?  WELL, THE WRITERS, NOT GOD AT ALL, WANTED TO ADD MORE DETAIL, MYSTERY, AND EXCITEMENT TO THE SCIENCE FICTION. 

 YES, THE BIBLE IS SCIENCE FICTION. 

VERSE 5 SAYS THAT THE DEVIL TOOK JESUS TO THE HOLY CITY.  IF JESUS WAS SUCH A "SON OF GOD" IN WHOM GOD WAS SUPPOSE TO BE WELL PLEASED, THEN JESUS WOULDN'T HAVE ALLOWED THE DEVIL TO "TAKETH HIM", LIKE TAKE POSSESSION OF OR CONTROL OF HIM, BUT RATHER, HE WOULD HAVE PROTESTED AGAINST SUCH ACTION.  AFTERALL, PEOPLE SAY THAT THE DEVIL IS ALWAYS UP TO NO GOOD.

AGAIN IN VERSE 5, THERE'S ANOTHER FLAW IN JESUS.  HE ALLOWS THE DEVIL PICKED HIM UP AND SET HIM ON TOP OF THE PINNACLE.  HERE AGAIN, THE DEVIL TAKES POSSESSION OF OR CONTROL OF JESUS.  TALK ABOUT "GIVE ME A LIFT"!  WHY WOULD JESUS NEED THE DEVIL TO PLACE HIM ON THE PINNACLE?  COULDN'T HE FLY UP TO THE TOP HIMSELF, SINCE HE'S THE SO CALLED "SON OF GOD"?  LATER JESUS WALKS ON WATER, SO WHAT'S THE BIG DEAL ABOUT HOVERING UP TO THE TOP?    

THE DEVIL WANTED JESUS TO JUMP OFF THE PINNACLE TO PROVE HIS "SONSHIP".  IRONICALLY, JESUS RESPONDS SAYING THAT GOD IS NOT TO BE TEMPTED.  IF GOD ISN'T TO BE TEMPTED, THEN JESUS WOULD HAVE NEVER ALLOWED THE DEVIL TO POSSESS OR CONTROL HIM, POINT BLANK.  JESUS HAS TESTIFIED THAT HE HAS FLAWS, THAT HE HAS BLEMISHES, THAT HE TOO ALLOWS SINFULLY NATURE TO OVERPOWER HIM AND CAUSES HIM TO BE DISOBEDIENT.   

CHRISTIANS SAY THAT THE BIBLE SAY THAT CHRISTIANS AREN'T TO BE UNEVENLY YOLKED.  BUT VERSE 5 REVEALS JESUS FELLOWSHIPPING WITH THE DEVIL, BEING UNEVENLY YOKED!

EASTERN

^{KING JAMES VERSION, MATTHEW CHAPTER 2 VERSES 9-12:}
When they had heard the king, they departed; and, lo, the star, which they saw in the east, went before them, till it came and stood over where the young child was.

When they saw the star, they rejoiced with exceeding great joy.
 
And when they were come into the house, they saw the young child with Mary his mother, and fell down, and worshipped him: and when they had opened their treasures, they presented unto him gifts; gold, and frankincense and myrrh.
 
And being warned of God in a dream that they should not return to Herod, they departed into their own country another way.
 
"THEY" IS REFERRING TO THE WISE MEN.  WISE?  LOL. 

 
A STAR LEAD THEM, AND STOOD OVER "...WHERE THE YOUNG CHILD WAS"?  LOL.  NOW THAT'S FANTASY, A WALT DISNEY MOVIE PIECE!.  A STAR BEING USED AS A GPS DEVISE (LOL). 

BESIDE, NO WHERE IN THE BIBLE DOES GOD SAY THE HE WOULD USE A STAR TO GUIDE THE WISE MEN TO THE CHILD.  AND, THE MEN WERE STAR WORSHIPPERS (EASTERN RELIGION).  THEY DIDN'T COME TO BE CONVERTED, THEY ONLY WANTED TO HONOR, AS THEY THOUGHT WAS, THE KING OF THE JEWS.
 

 
NOTICE THAT VERSE 9 SAID, "...WHERE THE YOUNG CHILD WAS", AND NOT, "WHERE THE BABY WAS"?  THEREFORE, A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF TIME PASSED BY, SO THAT THE BABY AGED TO A YOUNG CHILD.   

EXAGGERATED PHOTO FOR LAUGHS. LOL.

THE MEN WERE FOOLS TO HAVE GIVEN THEIR GOLD, ETC..., TO THE WRONG CHILD.  REMEMBER THEY WERE LOOKING FOR THE KING OF THE JEWS, NOT A SAVIOR (MATTHEW 1). 
 
SEE VERSE 12?  THE MEN WERE PEOPLE OF A COUNTRY, THEREFORE OF A DIFFERENT RELIGION.

STAR

KING JAMES VERSION, MATTHEW CHAPTER 2 VERSES 1-2:

Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem,

<sup>Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen his star in the east, and are come to worship him.

VERSE 2 SAYS THAT THE WISE MEN SEEN "HIS STAR".  NO WHERE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT DOES GOD MENTION THAT HE WOULD ASSIGN A STAR IN THE SKY FOR EVIDENCE THAT JESUS/EMMANUEL IS THE KING OF THE JEWS.</sup>

THEREFORE, THE WISE MEN WERE LYING ABOUT SEEING "HIS STAR".

^{ALSO, JESUS CANNOT BE THE KING OF THE JEWS, BECAUSE HIS ONLY MISSION WAS TO SAVE HIS PEOPLE FROM THEIR SINS (MATTHEW CHAPTER 1 VERSE 21), NOT FROM THEIR RULING ENEMY.  SO THE WISE MEN WERE NOT WISE AFTER ALL, SINCE THEY WERE SEARCHING FOR A "KING OF THE JEWS".  IF ANYTHING EMMANUEL WOULD BE THE RULER/GOVERNOR/KING OF THE JEWS.} 

VIRGIN

KING JAMES VERSION (KJV), MATTHEW CHAPTER 1 VERSES 20-23:

But while he thought on these things, behold, the angel of the LORD appeared unto him in a dream, saying, Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost
.
TODAY'S TECH WILL PERMIT A VIRGIN TO BE PREGNANT WITHOUT SEXUAL INTERCOURSE THROUGH THE VAGINA.  BUT SUCH ISN'T THE CASE CONCERNING BIBLICAL DAYS. 

WITHOUT SPEAM FROM A MALE, A FEMALE'S CHANCE OF BECOMING PREGNANT IS ZERO!  SO THE VERSE PART, "...A VIRGIN SHALL BE WITH CHILD..." IS ABSOLUTELY FALLIBLE.

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR A FEMALE TO HAVE BECOME PREGNANT AND STILL BE A VIRGIN!  


FOR ONE, PREGNANCY CHANGES A  PREGNANT WOMAN'S BODY STRUCTURE AND CHEMISTRY.  THEREFORE, SHE IS NO LONGER PURE IN BODY AND CHEMISTRY.  SECOND CERTAIN ORGANS OF HERS HAVE BEEN TOUCHED (THAT IS, MADE CONTACT WITH) BY THE UNBORN, SPECIFICALLY, THE PLACETA, WHICH ALSO CARRIES WASTE FROM THE UNBORN INTO THE MOTHER'S BLOOD.  THIRD, WHEN IT'S TIME TO DELIVER, THE UNBORN BREAKS THROUGH THE VAGINA, WIDENING IT BEYOND ITS NORMAL MEASURE. 

OF COURSE, ANOTHER METHOD THOUSANDS OF YEARS AGO MADE IT SO THAT THE UNBORN WAS TAKEN FROM THE ABDOMEN (C-SECTION).  BUT MATTHEW DOESN'T SPEAK OF SUCH MATTER CONCERNING MARY.


NEVERTHELESS, MARY WASN'T A VIRGIN DURING NOR AFTER PREGNANCY, AS SOME CHRISTIANS STILL SAY, "THE VIRGIN MARY".

SOME CHRISTIANS BELIEVE THAT AFTER MARY GAVE BIRTH TO JESUS, HER VAGINA WAS RESTRUCTURED BACK TO THE WAY IT WAS BEFORE PREGNANCY, BY GOD.  THEY LOVE TO USE GOD STITCHING UP ADAM'S RIB FOR AN EXAMPLE OF GOD'S SURGERY SKILLS.  WHAT ANOTHER FANTASY, PURE FANTASY!     

.
VERSE 21 CLEARLY STATES THAT JOSEPH WAS COMMANDED TO NAME THE BOY JESUS, BECAUSE HE SHALL SAVE HIS PEOPLE FROM THEIR SINS.   JESUS COMES FROM THE HEBREW WORD YESHUA, WHICH MEANS YAH IS SALVATION.  


THE NAME JESUS AND THE NAME YESHUA ARE RELATED TO 2 DIFFERENT MATTERS.  THE NAME JESUS IS CONCERNING WITH SAVING THE HEBREWS FROM THEIR SINS, BUT YESHUA IS CONCERNING WITH RESCUING THE HEBREWS FROM THEIR ENEMIES, LIKE THE ROMAN GOVERNMENT.


JESUS=RESCUE FROM SINS:

YESHUA=RESCUE FROM FOREIGN GOVERNMENT:



THEREFORE, THE NAME JESUS, ISN'T THE ACTUAL TRANSLATION. AND THE TRANSLATORS FROM DIFFERENT SOCIETIES GOT THE TRANSLATION WRONG!  THERE WAS NO LETTER "J" IN THE HEBREW ALPHABET!  THEREFORE THE NAME JESUS IS MEANINGLESS.   

BUT KJV, MATTHEW CHAPTER 1 VERSES 21-23:

And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.
 
Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying,
 
Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and shall bring forth a son, and they shall call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted is, God with us.


VERSE 21 DOESN'T FULFILL THE SPOKEN WORD OF THE PROPHET, AS VERSE 22 SAY, IN VERSE 23.  VERSE 21 SAY HIS NAME IS TO BE CALLED JESUS, BUT VERSE 23 SAY THAT HIS NAME IS TO BE CALLED EMMANUEL!  SO WHICH IS HIS NAME BETWEEN THE TWO?  IS IT JESUS, AS MAJORITY OF THE UNIVERSE SAY (BEWARE OF MAJORITY, THEY HAVE A TENDENCY TO BE WRONG IN MANY THINGS) OR IS HIS NAME EMMANUEL?  GOD SAID WHAT HIS NAME IS, THEN AN ANGEL SAY A TOTALLY DIFFERENT NAME THAT DOESN'T EVEN HAVE CONNECTIONS WITH THE HEBREW COULTURE, IT DOES WITH THE GREEK AND ROMAN COULTURES.  REMEMBER EMMANUEL IS OF THE HEBREW, BUT JESUS IS OF GREEK AND ROMAN.


SO PEOPLE PRAYING, BAPTISING, AND DO OTHER THINGS IN THE NAME OF JESUS, DEFINITELY HAVE BEEN DOING THINGS FOR A DIFFERENT SAVIOR AND NOT FOR THE MESSIAH EMMANUEL WHOM THE BIBLE CLEARLY SPEAKS OF.  HERE'S A SIDE NOTE:  YES, THERE ARE VARIATIONS IN THE SPELLING OF THE NAME EMMANUEL, BUT THE PRONOUNCIATION STAYS THE SAME AND SO DOES THE MEANING, BIBLICALLY.

                                                         
PHOTO COURTESY OF  d3m0

THERE'S NOT ONE PERSON WHO CAN PROVE FROM THE USE OF THE BIBLE THAT GOD SAID THAT THE NAME EMMANUEL WOULD BE CHANGED TO JESUS.